Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

[Danny Kukawka]

On Freitag, 4. Mai 2007, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 12:29 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > Currently, hal accepts to suspend. And g-p-m will complain if next
> > restart of it detect an aborted suspend.
>
> Yes, I think this is the best way. It's just not efficient to whitelist
> *every* type of laptop that has been produced, where things work without
> bodges.

But do it the way as s2ram it currently do would force the ppl. to report the 
quirks they need to suspend back to hal-info/s2ram and if they need nothing 
we could whitelist them also. This is the reason why there are so many 
whitelisted machines in s2ram.

Danny