mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Sun Jun 1 07:38:36 PDT 2008
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:33:39AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 14:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > AT+CGSN should give us a unique identifier regardless of whether it's
> > CDMA or GSM. Worst case on normal modems is that it gives an error, but
> It only gives me an error on a Sierra 595U. Do you mean "AT+GSN"
> instead? That's defined in IS-707-A, but CGSN is not. I have also
> found some references that talk about AT+CGSN for CDMA devices though,
> but again I've got an example right here that doesn't support CGSN but
> does support GSN.
Huh, weird. My Sierra accepts both. Still, if GSN is specced then that
sounds like a good plan.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the hal