[hal-info PATCH] Rationalise Acer keyboard map

Matthew Garrett mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Jun 24 03:03:58 PDT 2008


On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:07:23AM +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:

> And what about the conserns regarding performance and mapping unneeded keys 
> (especially on machines that need no mapping which is connected to loss of 
> performance). There e.g. is no usefull way blacklist machines if they need no 
> mapping ... etc.

The performance loss is minimal (as you demonstrated) and nothing is 
broken by having extra mappings. What's the issue here?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org


More information about the hal mailing list