Update on DeviceKit
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Thu May 8 05:35:11 PDT 2008
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:27:17PM +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> On Wed 07. May - 12:11:00, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > - Is CPUFreq still something we want?
> Yes, to be able to do fine-tuning, but with a slightly different interface
> that in current HAL.
I'm not convinced that fine tuning is something that can be done in a
generic way. It's going to be kernel specific, and there's no sense in
having it tweakable at a per-user level. Trying to fit it into any sort
of dbus interface would basically just be exposing the sysfs interface
over dbus, which doesn't sound like a great idea...
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the hal