Thanks, ok, will do :)<br>(Now that i'm working on the C++ wrapper i'll be watching the development more closely so i _may_ actually notice something before i gets disted, haha)<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/26/06,
<b class="gmail_sendername">Richard Hughes</b> <<a href="mailto:hughsient@gmail.com">hughsient@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 20:54 +0100, Milosz Derezynski wrote:<br>> I've noticed some subtle differences between hal 0.5.7.x and hal<br>> 0.5.8.x which are not clear to me as to why this happened:<br><br>I don't think HAL is internal-API stable. I think externally (methods
<br>and LibHal and things) we are pretty good at preserving compatibility,<br>but internally I think it's fair game to change structures. I do think<br>the consequences of changing of the index->idx name was perhaps not
<br>fully understood, and if you see any other API changes like this in the<br>future, then please SHOUT LIKE MAD, and we'll see what we can do. :-)<br><br>Richard.<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>