[Harfbuzz-indic] Unicode vs OpenType: nukta after halant
bmassot at free.fr
Mon Jul 18 23:04:15 PDT 2011
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 06:02:04AM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> On 07/19/2011 12:28 AM, Bernard Massot wrote:
> >As far as vedic signs are concerned, OT's saying doesn't even make much
> >sense since vedic signs are used only with ancient Sanskrit, whereas
> >nukta was invented afterwards to represent sounds alien to Sanskrit.
> >They should never occur together.
> True, but perhaps rendering engines need to provide *some
> meaningful* output for any input.
That's right. Actually my remark was more of a side remark I made to
underline the lack of seriousness of this document.
More information about the HarfBuzz-Indic