On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 10:41 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On 10/27/10 09:19, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > because c->buffer->info[i].gproperty == 65535 > > So I think there's still an issue. > > Fixed that too. Pushed out. Cool to know my assumptions were correct. Thank you very much, works like a charm. -- Tom.