[HarfBuzz] Renaming the shapers?

[Shriramana Sharma]

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Indic shaper supports some non-indic scripts as well. So yes, using
> generic name looks logical.

But I prefer something other than "reordering", because that doesn't
really seem to be the catch term for Indic. Indic is, well, Indic. Or
maybe Brahmic. Reordering, split-positioning, conjoining forms and
ligatures -- these are what characterize Indic. What single term can
be appropriate to cover all of them without prejudice to another?

-- 
Shriramana Sharma