<html> <head> <style></style></head> <body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2"><br></font><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2">Dear Behdad,</font><div><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2"><br></font></div><div><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2">I try it right away.</font></div><div><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2">Thank you so much.</font><div><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2"><br></font></div><div><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2">Best Regards,</font></div><div><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2"><br></font></div><div><font style="font-size:10pt;" face="Verdana" size="2">Scott </font><br><br><div>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:44:05 -0400<br>> From: behdad@behdad.org<br>> To: coolscott@hotmail.com<br>> CC: graham.douglas@readytext.co.uk; harfbuzz@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> Subject: Re: [HarfBuzz] I wonder why glyph 'uni0647' is not substituted with the one at 0xFEE9('uni06BE.fina') in Tahoma font<br>> <br>> You can also try with my DLL from:<br>> <br>> http://www.freedesktop.org/software/harfbuzz/release/harfbuzz-0.9.21-win32.zip<br>> <br>> On 13-09-18 11:34 AM, Su Scott wrote:<br>> > Hi Graham<br>> > <br>> > Thanks for your kindly suggestion.<br>> > I am still struggling with this issue,<br>> > Mind if you send me a copy of your win32 bundle version?<br>> > I wanna compare with each other for the key difference in config or setting.<br>> > <br>> > Thank you so much.<br>> > <br>> > Scott <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:49:50 +0100<br>> > From: graham.douglas@readytext.co.uk<br>> > To: coolscott@hotmail.com<br>> > CC: harfbuzz@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> > Subject: Re: [HarfBuzz] I wonder why glyph 'uni0647' is not substituted with<br>> > the one at 0xFEE9('uni06BE.fina') in Tahoma font<br>> > <br>> > On 18/09/2013 10:32, Su Scott wrote:<br>> > <br>> > Thank you so much for the detail testing.<br>> > It proves my resultis wrong.<br>> > Hope I dig the reason out soon.<br>> > <br>> > ^ ^<br>> > <br>> > Scott <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> > <<snip lots>><br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Hi Scott<br>> > <br>> > Just a suggestion, but try experimenting with the glyph uni0654 between other<br>> > pairs of joining characters to see if that also prevents correct shaping behavior.<br>> > <br>> > Best<br>> > Graham<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > HarfBuzz mailing list<br>> > HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz<br>> > <br>> <br>> -- <br>> behdad<br>> http://behdad.org/<br></div></div></div> </div></body> </html>