[immodule-qt] Re: [i18n] Re: Updated: qt-immodule

[Kazuki Ohta]

Hmm..

We need to clarify the relation ship of Qt-immodule and other IM related 
projects like iiimf, SCIM, uim...

> Hi,
>
> If you use scim-uim + uim, then uim-applet is not necessary anymore.
>
> Regards
> James Su
>
> On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:43:25 +0200, Thierry Vignaud
>
> <tvignaud at mandrakesoft.com> wrote:
> > UTUMI Hirosi <utuhiro78 at yahoo.co.jp> writes:
> > > > > > does XIM mode works smoothly when there's no qt-immodule?
> > > > >
> > > > > Qt-immodule doesn't influence XIM.
> > > >
> > > > what i intended to means: if we dot do input through qt-immodule,
> > > > will it works smoothly throuh xim (aka does current scim and uim
> > > > support xim) ?
> > >
> > > SCIM supports XIM well, but UIM's XIM support is broken.
> > > (Note: "scim-xim +UIM" work fine.)
> >
> > that's fine then since:
> > - japanese requires scim-uim uim-applet packages
> > - korean requires ami package (but soon scim and scim-hangul instead)
> > - chinese requires scim-chinese scim-tables packages
> >
> > > Most kde users type i18n words with "scim-xim +UIM" in Mandrake, so
> > > they don't need/test Qt-immodule.
> >
> > let's say this'll be the next leading step for mdk10.1 and kde-3.3.2
> >
> > we still have improved regarding CJK support (though there seems we
> > can improve further for other language for which scim/uim provides
> > input method)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > immodule-qt mailing list
> > immodule-qt at freedesktop.org
> > http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/immodule-qt
>
> _______________________________________________
> immodule-qt mailing list
> immodule-qt at freedesktop.org
> http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/immodule-qt

-- 
---------------------------------
Move the worl:D!
Kazuki Ohta : mover at hct.zaq.ne.jp