[immodule-qt] Re: scim-qtimm 0.7 released

YamaKen yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
Mon Sep 6 19:21:10 EEST 2004


Hi Mike, nice to meet you, hajimemashite.

At Mon, 06 Sep 2004 15:38:03 +0200,
mfabian at suse.de wrote:
> 
> YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> さんは書きました:
> 
> > Hi James,
> >
> > At Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:04:30 +0800,
> > james.su at gmail.com wrote:
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >>   Changing postIMEvent to:
> >> 
> >> void QApplication::postIMEvent( QObject *receiver, QIMEvent *event )
> >>  {
> >>      sendEvent( receiver, event );
> >> }
> >> 
> >> can fix this issue. 
> >
> > It's exactly same as our first implementation and insufficient
> > for some users.
> 
> What do you mean by insufficient? Does it cause problems or
> is it only slow?

Only slow (in some language or hardware). But I can't sense such
problem in my environment with 60 chars/sec key repeat with a
Japanese input method uim-anthy. So you could use following
James's code as temporary solution.

src/kernel/qapplication_x11.cpp:
 void QApplication::postIMEvent( QObject *receiver, QIMEvent *event )
 {
-    postEvent( receiver, event );
+    sendEvent( receiver, event );
 }

> > Although it is most safe and simple way, Cougar
> > had suggest the event compression to resolve his problem.
> 
> -- 
> Mike FABIAN   <mfabian at suse.de>   http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
> 睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。

-------------------------------
YamaKen  yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp



More information about the immodule-qt mailing list