[immodule-qt] Send IMEnd event on reset
choe.hwanjin at gmail.com
Mon Jan 10 01:13:50 EET 2005
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:38:32 +0100, Lars Knoll <lars at trolltech.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 09 January 2005 14:48, Daisuke Kameda wrote:
> > Choe Hwanjin <choe.hwanjin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > But, I think that we should leave the processing when receiving reset
> > > > to XIM server. In my memory, since the specification of XmbResetIC is
> > > > not clear, last preedit string may be commited doubly.
> > >
> > > I think this problem will be happen only when the xim implementation
> > > commit the preedit
> > > string on XmbResetIC and return the preedit string. In other cases,
> > > double commit will not
> > > happen. I think many xim implemetation will not commit preedit string
> > > and then return
> > > the preedit string on Reset function.
> > I considered many things or investigated.
> > As the conclusion, I think that change should be adopted.
> > I think that your opinion is right.
> > And, I think that operation at the time of reset should be dependent only
> > on input method (framework). However, it is also required to be the same
> > operation as other frameworks.
> > Then, after investigation, it turned out that it is committed in gtk+
> > application at least. So, it will be appropriate to follow this action.
> > Lars, please adopt the patch in Qt4.
> I'm not sure I understand this as I seem to not have gotten the original mail
> from Choe Hwanjin and never saw any patch. Please send me this information
> once again.
Maybe you are not a member of this list.
You can read my mail here:
More information about the immodule-qt