[immodule-qt] Re: Question about deletion of the method of QInputContext
kaminmat at cc.rim.or.jp
Tue Jan 18 04:22:55 EET 2005
Sorry, I am busy to prepare reading a paper at an academic
meeting on this weekend. But, I will reply to these mails
during this week.
On Friday 14 January 2005 22:32, Lars Knoll wrote:
> On Friday 14 January 2005 11:49, Mike FABIAN wrote:
> > Choe Hwanjin <choe.hwanjin at gmail.com> さんは書きました:
> > > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:11:31 +0900, Daisuke Kameda
> > >
> > > <kaminmat at cc.rim.or.jp> wrote:
> > >> On Thursday 06 January 2005 02:15, Lars Knoll wrote:
> > [...]
> > >> > So for XIM, focus changes do not any longer cause the preedit string
> > >> > to be reset, but it is preserved until the widget regains focus.
> > >> > Please try what I have implemented for XIM together with e.g.
> > >> > kinput2 and tell me if this is the wanted behaviour.
> > >>
> > >> I'm considering well about this.
> > >>
> > >> Although present operation is good for Japanese, I think that
> > >> the operation which doesn't reset is not always required.
> > >> If anything, there must be more many languages for which
> > >> it is good behavior not doing so.
> > >>
> > >> Probably, this point at least should be taken into consideration.
> > >
> > > I think this problem is important. Reseting ic on focus out event is a
> > > needed feature for korean, and I think other languages too.
> > > In some cases the last preedit string may be lost.
> > >
> > > And I really curious about that.
> > > Kameda san, let me know how japanese input text usually, and why that
> > > feature is needed.
> > > I don't still understand why :)
> > I don't understand why that is needed either. To the contrary, I find
> > it very annoying when a preedit string is preserved on focus change
> > and an old preedit string is recovered if the widget regains focus.
> > I think it is more natural when the preedit string is committed on
> > focus change.
> I thought so as well up to now, as this is the way it works on Windows. I
> don't have any problem implementing either way, but I would really like to
> have an answer here at some point. Committing the string on focus change
> would make the IM handling a lot easier, especially in the text widgets
> IMO implementing string reconversion correctly would be the better way of
> dealing with it.
> immodule-qt mailing list
> immodule-qt at lists.freedesktop.org
Daisuke Kameda <kaminmat at cc.rim.or.jp>
More information about the immodule-qt