<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [BDW Regression]xinit fails with Unknown Intel device.xinit: giving up"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73024">bug 73024</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Assignee</td>
<td>xorg-team@lists.x.org
</td>
<td>idr@freedesktop.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">QA Contact</td>
<td>xorg-team@lists.x.org
</td>
<td>intel-3d-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Product</td>
<td>xorg
</td>
<td>Mesa
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Version</td>
<td>unspecified
</td>
<td>git
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Component</td>
<td>Server/General
</td>
<td>Drivers/DRI/i965
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [BDW Regression]xinit fails with Unknown Intel device.xinit: giving up"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73024#c13">Comment # 13</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [BDW Regression]xinit fails with Unknown Intel device.xinit: giving up"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73024">bug 73024</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>So you managed to link the xserver against the wrong mesa lib, but mesa should
not be using abort(!) there either.
commit 6e9f427ed8a20d78e7d832b163d757827dd3e74f
Author: Kenneth Graunke <<a href="mailto:kenneth@whitecape.org">kenneth@whitecape.org</a>>
Date: Thu Jul 4 12:11:36 2013 -0700
i965: Add a new brw_device_info structure.
The idea is that struct brw_device_info should store statically-known
information about hardware features. Using the new family name in the
PCI ID table, we can easily grab the right structure.
This is basically the equivalent of intel_device_info in the kernel.
This patch also makes the new structure available from intel_screen, but
nothing uses it. Right now, it looks very redundant with existing
fields, but that will change.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <<a href="mailto:kenneth@whitecape.org">kenneth@whitecape.org</a>>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <<a href="mailto:ian.d.romanick@intel.com">ian.d.romanick@intel.com</a>></pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>