<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [i965 Bisected]Piglit spec/NV_conditional_render_blitframebuffer fails" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77702#c1">Comment # 1</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [i965 Bisected]Piglit spec/NV_conditional_render_blitframebuffer fails" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77702">bug 77702</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:idr@freedesktop.org" title="Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org>"> Ian Romanick</a> <pre>I think the test is incorrect. Section 10.10 (Conditional Rendering) of the OpenGL 4.4 spec says: "If the result (SAMPLES_PASSED) of the query is zero, or if the result (ANY_SAMPLES_PASSED or ANY_SAMPLES_PASSED_CONSERVATIVE) is false, all rendering commands described in section 2.4 are discarded and have no effect when issued between BeginConditionalRender and the corresponding EndConditionalRender." Section 2.4 (Rendering Commands) says: "Such commands are called rendering commands, and include the drawing commands *Draw* (see section 10.5), as well as these additional commands: • BlitFramebuffer (see section 18.3.1) • Clear (see section 17.4.3) • ClearBuffer* (see section 17.4.3.1) • DispatchCompute* (see section 19)" It would have been much better to have these spec references in the commit message and the in-code comments than the reference that is there. Oh well. Out of curiosity... Does this test pass as-is on NVIDIA or AMD?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>