<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - i965: Relax accumulator dependency scheduling on Gen < 6" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77740#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - i965: Relax accumulator dependency scheduling on Gen < 6" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77740">bug 77740</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:itoral@igalia.com" title="Iago Toral <itoral@igalia.com>"> Iago Toral</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=98117" name="attach_98117" title="Patch">attachment 98117</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=98117&action=edit" title="Patch">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=77740&attachment=98117'>[review]</a> Patch I managed to get an ironlake laptop so I could test the patch myself. I tested with a small program that implemented a simple lightning model demo and seems to work fine. According to the debug traces in instruction_scheduler::schedule_instructions() I can see that the patch is indeed influencing instruction scheduling (I'll attach the traces). Might need more thorough testing though, please let me know if there are specific tests that you would like me to run to verify the patch before sending it for review to the mailing list.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>