<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - [IVB/BYT Bisected]etqw-demo/Lightsmarkv2008/warsowv1.0/Counter-Strike:source/Half-Life2/Portal/synmark2_v6/unigine-demos/GLbenchmarkv2.5.1/GLbenchmarkv2.7.0/3DMME2.0_taiji/3DMME2.0_hoverjet performance reduced 10%~90%" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82592#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - [IVB/BYT Bisected]etqw-demo/Lightsmarkv2008/warsowv1.0/Counter-Strike:source/Half-Life2/Portal/synmark2_v6/unigine-demos/GLbenchmarkv2.5.1/GLbenchmarkv2.7.0/3DMME2.0_taiji/3DMME2.0_hoverjet performance reduced 10%~90%" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82592">bug 82592</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jianx.zhou@intel.com" title="zhoujian <jianx.zhou@intel.com>"> zhoujian</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=82592#c3">comment #3</a>) > Broadwell cannot have a performance regression due to this commit, as that > commit only changes Gen4-7 code generation. Gen8+ was completely unaffected. > > According to QA's performance tracking page, Synmark OglBatch0 performance > actually increased by 8% between 8/06 and 8/13 on Broadwell. Which is very > different than a 10-90% performance regression as reported. I mistake,this issue doesn't exists on BDW.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>