<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import too limited on i965"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87452#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import too limited on i965"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87452">bug 87452</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:topi.pohjolainen@intel.com" title="Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolainen@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Topi Pohjolainen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>While the patch is indeed written by me, the reasoning behind is not originally
mine. I simply did what others wanted. I recall at least Ian, Eric and Chad
arguing in favour for this patch. If they (and other people of course) are fine
in reverting the patch I for sure don't have any problem with it. However, I'd
prefer somebody that benefits from the revert to do it instead. There is the
potential for further bug reports when somebody binds dma-buffers via textures
for 3D rendering.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>