<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [10.5.5/10.6 regression, bisected] PBO glDrawPixels no longer using blit fastpath" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90839#c10">Comment # 10</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [10.5.5/10.6 regression, bisected] PBO glDrawPixels no longer using blit fastpath" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90839">bug 90839</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:amonakov@gmail.com" title="Alexander Monakov <amonakov@gmail.com>"> Alexander Monakov</a> <pre>Do you get the same INTEL_DEBUG=perf,pix diagnostics on the small repro referenced in the opening comment? Can you apply the following patch and collect INTEL_DEBUG=perf,pix output again? At least we'll know which exact formats are rejected. >From 981de62fb518cae8a2278123597131f4d22e930d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Monakov <<a href="mailto:amonakov@ispras.ru">amonakov@ispras.ru</a>> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:58:29 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] i965: spell out incompatible formats in do_blit_drawpixels --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_pixel_draw.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_pixel_draw.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_pixel_draw.c index d68cbb6..d39c698 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_pixel_draw.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_pixel_draw.c @@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ do_blit_drawpixels(struct gl_context * ctx, dst_format = _mesa_get_srgb_format_linear(dst_format); if (!intel_miptree_blit_compatible_formats(src_format, dst_format)) { - DBG("%s: bad format for blit\n", __func__); + DBG("%s: bad format for blit: %s to %s\n", __func__, + _mesa_get_format_name(src_format), + _mesa_get_format_name(dst_format)); return false; }</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>