<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [SNB,regression,dEQP,bisected] functional.shaders.random tests regressed" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92033#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [SNB,regression,dEQP,bisected] functional.shaders.random tests regressed" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92033">bug 92033</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:apuentes@igalia.com" title="Antia Puentes <apuentes@igalia.com>"> Antia Puentes</a> <pre>(In reply to Jason Ekstrand from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92033#c1">comment #1</a>) > I'm pretty sure I know exactly what's going on here. NIR has swizzles for > all ALU instructions, but i965 can't swizzle some (maybe all?) math > instructions. The easiest fix would be to simply make emit_math emit an > additional MOV if there is a non-trivial swizzle. The reason this showed up > as a regression is probably that we're doing better coalescing now than we > were before. The bug was present, we just weren't tickling it. I'm > re-assigning this to one of the Igalia people. Thanks for the tip. I will be taking a look at this.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>