<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [SKL bisected] texsubimage pbo intermittent failures"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91926#c41">Comment # 41</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [SKL bisected] texsubimage pbo intermittent failures"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91926">bug 91926</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:topi.pohjolainen@intel.com" title="Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolainen@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Topi Pohjolainen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Right, it still fails even when the faulty dimensions are rejected. The first
version I had for this just reduced the probability of faulty pixels appearing.
The test runs a loop of ten iterations during each it randomly selects the
dimensions. In the first version I simply skipped the iteration and therefore
the test tried fewer rectangles. I replaced the skip by a loop that keeps on
re-selecting dimensions until they are valid. Now the test really runs the ten
iterations and after 211 rounds of the test itself I got faulty pixels on IVB.
(This is based on the original form of the test).
The simplified version I have doesn't suffer from invalid dimensions as one of
the simplifications is hard-coded dimensions known to produce the faulty pixels
with high probability. Therefore I was skeptical of the connection between the
invalid dimensions (failing upload) and the pixels errors. Above confirms this.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>