<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [SKL bisected] texsubimage pbo intermittent failures"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91926#c53">Comment # 53</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [SKL bisected] texsubimage pbo intermittent failures"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91926">bug 91926</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:topi.pohjolainen@intel.com" title="Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolainen@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Topi Pohjolainen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Topi Pohjolainen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91926#c52">comment #52</a>)
<span class="quote">> I hacked intel_buffer_objects.c::alloc_buffer_object() to pass extra 4096
> bytes to the size given to drm_intel_bo_alloc(). This seems to prevent the
> failure also (at least I get 200 test rounds without pixel failures).
>
> I used a hack since this interface (glBufferData()) has no notion of width
> or height and therefore preventing cleaner solution.
>
>
> I would like to note that without knowing the algorithm for the cache
> handling, these findings are not yet conclusive - it is still possible that
> they are once again hiding the real explanation.</span >
This also makes a difference on SKL. I tried with the original piglit test -
200 rounds without failure.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>