<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Incorrect GEN for ASTC in Surface Format Table" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92925#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Incorrect GEN for ASTC in Surface Format Table" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92925">bug 92925</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:nanleychery@gmail.com" title="Nanley Chery <nanleychery@gmail.com>"> Nanley Chery</a> <pre>(In reply to Kenneth Graunke from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92925#c1">comment #1</a>) > By Gen8.5 do you mean Cherryview/Braswell? > Yes. Looking at the Bspec, it seems like CherryView actually isn't 8.5. > We've not had a good solution for encoding the atom parts in the table. > > For example, Ivybridge is Gen 7, Haswell is Gen 7.5, and Baytrail...doesn't > have most of the features from Haswell (so it'd be Gen 7.1/2/3/4?) but also > has features from Broadwell (so, Gen 7.6/7/8/9?). It just didn't fit at > all, so we left it as "7" and put in special cases for it. > > I guess for Cherryview we could consider it Gen 8.<something>. I'm fine with giving it a decimal point if everyone agrees on an atom part naming scheme. Another possible solution is to modify brw_init_surface_formats(). I'm not yet sure what the best solution is.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>