<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [Regression, bisected] Screen is darker than expected in Supertuxkart" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92759#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [Regression, bisected] Screen is darker than expected in Supertuxkart" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92759">bug 92759</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:neil@linux.intel.com" title="Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>"> Neil Roberts</a> <pre>Many thanks for the detailed bug report and all the research into the problem. I think this is a problem with Mesa in that we should be using an sRGB-capable visual even if no alpha bits are requested. It's not possible to force Mesa to give you an sRGB-capable visual because apparently we don't advertise any, but then we use sRGB formats internally anyway. I've posted a patch which should fix this here: <a href="http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/67844/">http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/67844/</a> Arguably there is a bug in supertuxkart too because perhaps it shouldn't assume it always gets an sRGB visual and it should fall back if one isn't available. However in practice if we fix this bug in Mesa then there's probably no cases where that would happen except for the broken Mesa versions.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>