<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [HSW,BDW,SKL][GLES 3.1 CTS] Big difference in the results for the ES31-CTS.shader_bitfield_operation.* tests"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92595#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [HSW,BDW,SKL][GLES 3.1 CTS] Big difference in the results for the ES31-CTS.shader_bitfield_operation.* tests"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92595">bug 92595</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Marta Löfstedt</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=120561" name="attach_120561" title="Hack that fix the difference in results between HSW and BDW/SKL">attachment 120561</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=120561&action=edit" title="Hack that fix the difference in results between HSW and BDW/SKL">[details]</a></span>
Hack that fix the difference in results between HSW and BDW/SKL
Sorry, I attached the wrong version of the patch and did the same mistake to
myself when testing on SKL. It is when I hack BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UW for both
signed and unsigned that I pass the imulExtended shader_bitfield tests on BDW
and SKL(kernel 4.2.0).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>