<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
    </head>
    <body>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [HSW,BDW,SKL][GLES 3.1 CTS] Big difference in the results for the ES31-CTS.shader_bitfield_operation.* tests"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92595#c6">Comment # 6</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [HSW,BDW,SKL][GLES 3.1 CTS] Big difference in the results for the ES31-CTS.shader_bitfield_operation.* tests"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92595">bug 92595</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Marta Löfstedt</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=120561" name="attach_120561" title="Hack that fix the difference in results between HSW and BDW/SKL">attachment 120561</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=120561&action=edit" title="Hack that fix the difference in results between HSW and BDW/SKL">[details]</a></span>
Hack that fix the difference in results between HSW and BDW/SKL

Sorry, I attached the wrong version of the patch and did the same mistake to
myself when testing on SKL. It is when I hack BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UW for both
signed and unsigned that I pass the imulExtended shader_bitfield tests on BDW
and SKL(kernel 4.2.0).</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>