<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Unigine Heaven 4.0 silhuette run" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92233#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Unigine Heaven 4.0 silhuette run" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92233">bug 92233</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> Ilia Mirkin</a> <pre>(In reply to Kenneth Graunke from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92233#c8">comment #8</a>) > (In reply to Tom Englund from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92233#c7">comment #7</a>) > > this should have not made it into the repo for the very same reasons why the > > kernel doesnt fix broken userspace tools. with this you fixed it for some > > cards, but regressed on the rest. at most it should have been left as a > > patch/workaround here in the comments affected users could have applied. > > What regression are you talking about? It causes a major performance regression on e.g. nouveau. I assume this is because they do n+1 passes where they would have done n.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>