<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - [sna gen4] flickering rendering" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55500#c35">Comment # 35</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - [sna gen4] flickering rendering" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55500">bug 55500</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=55500#c34">comment #34</a>) > I'm not yet convinced that my <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Firefox image now seems to be flickering during move with SNA" href="show_bug.cgi?id=58139">Bug 58139</a> is duplicate of this BZ. > > There are noticeable differences - when I use some ffmpeg capture tool, to > grab picture from screen - it seems to be not catch those 'visual' errors > I'm observing on laptops LCD (and captured with mobile phone). > (On the other hand I could have just wrong options passed in to the grab > tool) > > Also in my case, it's rather something 'new' in this 'scale' - since I'm not > aware I'd have been seeing this with several months older SNA driver. > > (Eventually I could possibly try bisect if I found some 'boring' movie to > watch :)) I'm using this bug as a catch-all for the issues I'm uncovering with enabling gen4.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>