<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - [ilk regression] gpu hangs on ironlake with 3.6 + -next + -fixes code" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55984#c111">Comment # 111</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - [ilk regression] gpu hangs on ironlake with 3.6 + -next + -fixes code" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55984">bug 55984</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=55984#c110">comment #110</a>) > Hi Daniel, hi Chris > > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=55984#c107">comment #107</a>) > > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=71805" name="attach_71805" title="make the shrinker less aggressive">attachment 71805</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=71805&action=edit" title="make the shrinker less aggressive">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=55984&attachment=71805'>[review]</a> [review] [review] > > make the shrinker less aggressive > > > > Duct-tape solution if it is one, but imo very much worth a try. > > There have been a lot of patches floating around, but I was running 3.7.0 > plus this patch now for a while, and using UXA (*not* using SNA, with SNA it > always was fine). > > I did not hit any problem till now, although I did heavy IO stuff as usual > (svn up and git svn rebase on two 6+Gb repos), etc. Meh. As that patch is basically changing the ordering of the objects considered for shrinking, it just opens a can of worms - but it does seem to be a stopgap workaround. > Chris: What should I do next? You have posted two patches (108 and 109 > comments), should I try both, or each on independently? #108 is a means of provoking the GPU to spot a lot more errors, it needs a little more refinement to not first fallover on standard UXA behaviour. I'd be interested in seeing if #109 has any effect at all (on stock 3.7.0 + uxa). There is also <a href="https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1896161/">https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1896161/</a> that would be useful to test (as it fixes a real bug and it would be cool if it was also an effective workaround here). > Or is the information that patch from 107 is fine (till now) enough? It is merely the start. :-p</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>