<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - I-G-T/ prime_self_import fail" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59229#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - I-G-T/ prime_self_import fail" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59229">bug 59229</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jani.nikula@intel.com" title="Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>"> Jani Nikula</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=59229#c2">comment #2</a>) > Disagree with Jani here, sounds like a different bug caught by the same test. My conclusion may have been hasty, based on the assumption that commit be8a42ae60addd8b6092535c11b42d099d6470ec Author: Seung-Woo Kim <<a href="mailto:sw0312.kim@samsung.com">sw0312.kim@samsung.com</a>> Date: Thu Sep 27 15:30:06 2012 +0900 drm/prime: drop reference on imported dma-buf come from gem was an attempt to fix <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - [IVB]I-G-T prime test/module_reload fail with *ERROR* “Memory manager not clean. Delaying takedown”" href="show_bug.cgi?id=54111">bug 54111</a>, but then caused this bug. In any case, the impact of said patch was known, but apparently ignored: <a href="http://mid.gmane.org/874nmjh995.fsf@intel.com">http://mid.gmane.org/874nmjh995.fsf@intel.com</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>