<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [965g] batch corruption, clflush?"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61477#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [965g] batch corruption, clflush?"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61477">bug 61477</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:yarvin@yarchive.net" title="Norman Yarvin <yarvin@yarchive.net>"> <span class="fn">Norman Yarvin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I just hit the bug again. I didn't see anything that looked like an assertion
triggering, just this (in both stderr and Xorg.0.log):
(EE) [mi] EQ overflowing. Additional events will be discarded until existing
events are processed.
(EE)
(EE) Backtrace:
(EE) 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x34) [0x597174]
(EE) 1: /usr/bin/X (mieqEnqueue+0x263) [0x577ad3]
(EE) 2: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x4fe84) [0x44fe84]
(EE) 3: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/input/evdev_drv.so (0x7fc0fdb9b000+0x6208)
[0x7fc0fdba1208]
(EE) 4: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x7a707) [0x47a707]
(EE) 5: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0xa57e7) [0x4a57e7]
(EE) 6: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x36aaa00000+0x10b80) [0x36aaa10b80]
(EE) 7: /lib64/libc.so.6 (ioctl+0x7) [0x36aa2e3b07]
(EE) 8: /usr/lib64/libdrm.so.2 (drmIoctl+0x28) [0x39262040f8]
(EE) 9: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7fc0ff8d6000+0x1be30)
[0x7fc0ff8f1e30]
(EE) 10: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7fc0ff8d6000+0x1d5f7)
[0x7fc0ff8f35f7]
(EE) 11: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7fc0ff8d6000+0x4ee5d)
[0x7fc0ff924e5d]
(EE) 12: /usr/bin/X (BlockHandler+0x44) [0x43f374]
(EE) 13: /usr/bin/X (WaitForSomething+0x11d) [0x59463d]
(EE) 14: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x3af32) [0x43af32]
(EE) 15: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x29cba) [0x429cba]
(EE) 16: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xed) [0x36aa22491d]
(EE) 17: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x2a011) [0x42a011]
(EE)
(EE) [mi] These backtraces from mieqEnqueue may point to a culprit higher up
the stack.
(EE) [mi] mieq is *NOT* the cause. It is a victim.
repeated several times with "overflow continuing".
Sorry, I neglected to save i915_error_state this time.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>