<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED --- - [IVB Bisected]I-G-T sysfs_rps Aborted"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63415#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED --- - [IVB Bisected]I-G-T sysfs_rps Aborted"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63415">bug 63415</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mika.kuoppala@intel.com" title="Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Mika Kuoppala</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>The patch changes the sysfs semantics for reading in
/sys/class/drm/card0/gt_max_freq_mhz. The commit message also states this.
Test assumes that reading gt_max_freq_mhz is the notion of current set maximum.
I feel that we should retain the previous semantics and if need be,
make a 'gt_max_oc_freq_mhz' as a read only sysfs entry.
But I don't know the user case for these sysfs entries. Daniel, Ben, comments?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>