<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [HSW desktop regression]Resume from s4 causes call trace and system hang"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63586#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [HSW desktop regression]Resume from s4 causes call trace and system hang"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63586">bug 63586</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:yangweix.shui@intel.com" title="shui yangwei <yangweix.shui@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">shui yangwei</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63586#c10">comment #10</a>)
<span class="quote">> So just to check: This failure after 95 resume cycles was on a kernel
> previously considered good? I.e. do we need to assume that this bug has
> always been there and this is not a regression, just some timing changes
> made it more likely?</span >
No, it's not a regression, because it need to run too many times S4 to
reproduce this issue, perhaps we haven't tested enough before. Now we use kexec
to instead of rpm package to install kernel(kexec kernel will build in initrd),
which will be easy to reproduce the issue.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>