<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - [Intel GM45] xrandr --output <output> --mode <prev_mode> is not able to light up an output that has been disabled with xrandr --off." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64178#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - [Intel GM45] xrandr --output <output> --mode <prev_mode> is not able to light up an output that has been disabled with xrandr --off." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64178">bug 64178</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imre.deak@gmail.com" title="Imre Deak <imre.deak@gmail.com>"> Imre Deak</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=64178#c4">comment #4</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=78812" name="attach_78812" title="Imre's patch modified.">attachment 78812</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=78812&action=edit" title="Imre's patch modified.">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=64178&attachment=78812'>[review]</a> [review] > Imre's patch modified. > > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=64178#c3">comment #3</a>) > > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=64178#c1">comment #1</a>) > > > Imre is already working on an almost identical fix for similar issues we > > > have with igt testscases randomly failing. > > > > Yes, it's <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [ILK]I-G-T/kms_flip subtest: 'wf_vblank-vs-modeset' fail" href="show_bug.cgi?id=59834">bug #59834</a>, the patch is attached to <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [PNV]I-G-T/kms_flip subtest：'blocking-absolute-wf_vblank' fail" href="show_bug.cgi?id=60002">bug #60002</a>. It may fix the > > first bug, but it hasn't been confirmed yet. But I think the patch fixes an > > issue anyway. I've sent it to the mailing list now. > > Imre, your patch looks nicer, unfortunately it doesn't work here. > > The reason is that the test is inside the "if (set->crtc->fb != set->fb)" > test. > In this case the fb has not changed however thus the extra test doesn't even > run. > > With the modified patch that's attached it works. Yes, you are right, I wasn't thinking of FB remaining the same.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>