<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imre.deak@gmail.com" title="Imre Deak <imre.deak@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Imre Deak</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - [HSW]I-G-T [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout when run gem_fence_thrash/bo-write-verify-threaded-x"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64661">bug 64661</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>DUPLICATE
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - [HSW]I-G-T [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout when run gem_fence_thrash/bo-write-verify-threaded-x"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64661#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - [HSW]I-G-T [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout when run gem_fence_thrash/bo-write-verify-threaded-x"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64661">bug 64661</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imre.deak@gmail.com" title="Imre Deak <imre.deak@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Imre Deak</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=64661#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=64661#c1">comment #1</a>)
> > This may be a duplicate of <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - linux-3.9: [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)!"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=64133">Bug 64133</a>. Could you check if the 'fix false
> > timeouts due to higher scheduling latencies' patch there gets rid of the
> > problem?
>
> Test with the patch 'fix false timeouts due to higher scheduling latencies',
> This issue goes away. I run it 5 cycles, It works well.</span >
Thanks. Setting as a duplicate based on this.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - linux-3.9: [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)!"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=64133">bug 64133</a> ***</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>