<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - Intel gen3 (945GM) fails to resume properly on Thinkpad X60s when lid is used to trigger suspend (XFCe)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64329#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - Intel gen3 (945GM) fails to resume properly on Thinkpad X60s when lid is used to trigger suspend (XFCe)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64329">bug 64329</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vrodic@gmail.com" title="Vedran Rodic <vrodic@gmail.com>"> Vedran Rodic</a> <pre>0. i upgraded my kernel to 3.9.3. the problem still persists 1. yes, this is a regression. however, downgrading DDX or kernel doesn't seem to fix it, and I've tried going way back to xf86-video-intel-2.16.902 and kernel 3.2.x so maybe it's a bug in Xserver or something else 2. yes, VT switching always works, and restarting X always makes X usable again 3. i've tried with uxa, same results 4. I've tried compiling DDX with --enable-debug=full, but it failed like this sna_accel.c:13801:12: warning: cast discards '__attribute__((const))' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wcast-qual] make[4]: *** [sna_accel.lo] Error 1 There were some gcc warnings above those lines, but no errors. the same source compiles without errors without --enable-debug=full. I'm using gcc 4.7.3 from Debian, and tried with gcc-4.8, with same results. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:10 AM, <<a href="mailto:bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org">bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org</a>> wrote: > <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=64329#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - Intel gen3 (945GM) fails to resume properly on Thinkpad X60s when lid is used to trigger suspend (XFCe)" href="show_bug.cgi?id=64329">bug 64329</a> from Chris Wilson > > Note that recompiling the DDX with --enable-debug=full will also give a lot > more information and indicate whether the userspace sanity checks are happy > with the crtc state post resume. > > ________________________________ > You are receiving this mail because: > > You reported the bug.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>