<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [i945]igt/gem_lut_handle Aborted"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65391">bug 65391</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [i945]igt/gem_lut_handle Aborted"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65391#c2">Comment # 2</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [i945]igt/gem_lut_handle Aborted"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65391">bug 65391</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>commit f1e9e300fa82181182e2e92ccce078682829a3a2
Author: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>>
Date:   Wed Jun 5 11:10:04 2013 +0100

    gem_lut_handle: Make the error checking explicit for LUT handling

    What this test is interested in is the handling of the LUT for very
    large arrays, irrespective of whether such batch are actually
    executable. So adjust the pass/fail checks to be explicit in the error
    they are looking for, so that we do not conflate memory/aperture
    pressure as a failure in the LUT API.

    Bugzilla: <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [i945]igt/gem_lut_handle Aborted"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=65391">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65391</a>
    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>></pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>