<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch" title="Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>"> <span class="fn">Daniel Vetter</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - [sdvo lvds regression] "Use &intel_sdvo->ddc instead of intel_sdvo->i2c for DDC""
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65524">bug 65524</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
           <td>
                
           </td>
           <td>eich@pdx.freedesktop.org
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - [sdvo lvds regression] "Use &intel_sdvo->ddc instead of intel_sdvo->i2c for DDC""
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65524#c11">Comment # 11</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - [sdvo lvds regression] "Use &intel_sdvo->ddc instead of intel_sdvo->i2c for DDC""
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65524">bug 65524</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch" title="Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>"> <span class="fn">Daniel Vetter</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Personally your experimental results reinforces my opinion that someone ordered
the shittiest sdvo encoder and the tiniest panel they could find and then
noticed that stuff doesn't work with a pixel mutliplier of 4.

To fix this they've frobbed the panel's mode so that it's just barely above
50MHz and this way tricked the Windows driver into picking a pixel mutliplier
of 2 without overtly offending the panel.

I share your fear for the reliability of VBT modes, but in this specific case
of SDVO-LVDS it looks like the vbt is actually more reliable. Especially if you
combine this with the fact that we've ignored the edid modes for a few years
completely. Maybe we need to double-check with egbert, but iirc the panel which
fails for him didn't have any vbt mode at all.

Egbert, can you please check whether my patch doesn't break your system?</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>