<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [HSW bisected] i915 module resume time regression"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65922#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [HSW bisected] i915 module resume time regression"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65922">bug 65922</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:gordon.jin@intel.com" title="Gordon Jin <gordon.jin@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Gordon Jin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=65922#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> During resume:
>
> good -> [ 24.789721] call 0000:00:02.0+ returned 0 after 253503 usecs
> bad -> [ 31.337787] call 0000:00:02.0+ returned 0 after 38479 usecs</span >
it looks like you make it opposite?
<span class="quote">> So switchless is indeed doing its job in speeding up resume. So I guess we
> need to look at what happens after the kernel finishes its resume. How are
> you measuring the resume time?</span >
Documented in QA wiki "HowtoGetResponseTime". But I think Cancan should put
details here.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>