<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [sdvo lvds regression] "Use &intel_sdvo->ddc instead of intel_sdvo->i2c for DDC""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65524#c14">Comment # 14</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [sdvo lvds regression] "Use &intel_sdvo->ddc instead of intel_sdvo->i2c for DDC""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65524">bug 65524</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tramsay@linux.vnet.ibm.com" title="Trey Ramsay <tramsay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>"> <span class="fn">Trey Ramsay</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Amusing.. I was going to commit a fix to the upstream kernel when I came across
this bug.
The complaint was that they were not able read the
/sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid information from their lvds display. Sound
familiar?
Long story short it was the same &intel_sdvo->ddc change. However I didn't
know about the pixel multiplier discrepancy. Good job fixing that!</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>