<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
    </head>
    <body>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [sdvo lvds regression] "Use &intel_sdvo->ddc instead of intel_sdvo->i2c for DDC""
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65524#c14">Comment # 14</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [sdvo lvds regression] "Use &intel_sdvo->ddc instead of intel_sdvo->i2c for DDC""
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65524">bug 65524</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tramsay@linux.vnet.ibm.com" title="Trey Ramsay <tramsay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>"> <span class="fn">Trey Ramsay</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Amusing.. I was going to commit a fix to the upstream kernel when I came across
this bug.   

The complaint was that they were not able read the
/sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid information from their lvds display.  Sound
familiar?

Long story short it was the same &intel_sdvo->ddc change.  However I didn't
know about the pixel multiplier discrepancy.  Good job fixing that!</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>