<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED --- - [HSW] no modes bigger than 1080p in the parsed EDID for 4k TV on both HDMI/VGA" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67030#c32">Comment # 32</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED --- - [HSW] no modes bigger than 1080p in the parsed EDID for 4k TV on both HDMI/VGA" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67030">bug 67030</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=67030#c31">comment #31</a>) > I noticed that X prunes those modes because their pixel clock is larger than > the other detailed modes. It'll have to be fixed at some point. > > (II) intel(0): Not using mode "3840x2160" (bad mode > clock/interlace/doublescan) The EDID does declare a dotclock limit of 300MHz, which is marginally more than required (297MHz). Can you dump the mode as it goes through X and so work out where/why it gets rejected?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>