<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Intel driver 2.21.13 hangs on shutdown process"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67490#c14">Comment # 14</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Intel driver 2.21.13 hangs on shutdown process"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67490">bug 67490</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>You are not using SNA, which is why this is quite strange. You have two
choices, either do a normal bisect looking for the commit that introduced the
hang, or a "reversed" bisect that looks for the commit that fixes the hang. In
a reversed bisect, you would treat as any hang as good, and any working commit
as bad:
$ git bisect start good 2.21.13 # broken
$ git bisect bad master # works
$ make && sudo make install # test
$ git bisect bad # if it works (shuts down without a hang)
$ git bisect good # if it hangs
and repeat make / git bisect (bad|good).
I suspect that both bisects will be useful to understanding this mystery.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>