<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - Using 2 screens impossible again with gen3"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67846#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - Using 2 screens impossible again with gen3"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67846">bug 67846</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sergio.callegari@gmail.com" title="sergio.callegari@gmail.com">sergio.callegari@gmail.com</a>
</span></b>
<pre>I have submitted <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1209261">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1209261</a>.
One more question...
If I understand properly the bug is not only in unity, but also in mesa since
the software fallbacks are broken. Is this the case? Should I open a bug on
mesa on this?
BTW, we all agree that unity tries to do too much GL and too much magic
autoconfiguration. Indeed, if at the attach of a second screen it asked the
user there would be no issue. However, how can unity know that it should not do
what it does if xrandr reports a max virtual size of 4096x4096 from which it
seems legitimate to put one screen on the side of the other? Is there some way
for it to finding out that fbos are limited to 2048x2048?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>