<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - [IVB regression] Screen corruption since Kernel 3.9 (+ 3.10) with HD 4000 on H77 Board HDMI to DVI" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68535#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - [IVB regression] Screen corruption since Kernel 3.9 (+ 3.10) with HD 4000 on H77 Board HDMI to DVI" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68535">bug 68535</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:sourcepower@gmx.org" title="Steven <sourcepower@gmx.org>"> Steven</a> <pre>Short question. I'm running the bisecting process currently. I'm down to roughly 4 turns to do. Now i have a build which "solves" the issue of this bug but adds a new issue while starting the X server. So my question is should i proceed with "git bisect good" because the KMS is working with this bisect build or should i proceed with "git bisect bad" because the X server doesn't start (= system freeze) with this bisect build?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>