<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body><a class="email" href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch" title="Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>"> Daniel Vetter</a> changed <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [Baytrail-M] mismatch in clock for eDP" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69248">bug 69248</a> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <th>What</th> <th>Removed</th> <th>Added</th> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:right;">Summary</td> <td>[Baytrail-M] Boot up with "[drm:intel_pipe_config_compare] *ERROR* mismatch in clock" and "Call Trace" </td> <td>[Baytrail-M] mismatch in clock for eDP </td> </tr></table> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [Baytrail-M] mismatch in clock for eDP" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69248#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [Baytrail-M] mismatch in clock for eDP" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69248">bug 69248</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch" title="Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>"> Daniel Vetter</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=69248#c2">comment #2</a>) > If eDP disabled, no matter whether VGA enabled or not ,there's also > call_trace and error, but "[drm:intel_pipe_config_compare] *ERROR* mismatch > in clock" disappeared. Thanks, I've updated the summary. > Error: > -------------------- > [ 4.713728] [drm:valleyview_enable_rps] *ERROR* GT fifo had a previous > error 10 That's a different bug, can you please file a new report for it? > Call Trace: > -------------------- > [ 2.672633] fb: conflicting fb hw usage inteldrmfb vs EFI VGA - removing > gene > ric driver > [ 2.672973] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25 > [ 2.691967] i915 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64 > [ 2.760073] [drm:intel_detect_pch], No PCH found? > [ 2.760338] INFO: trying to register non-static key. > [ 2.760351] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. > [ 2.760358] turning off the locking correctness validator. > [ 2.760369] CPU: 0 PID: 1191 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted > 3.11.0-rc7_drm-i > ntel-next-queued_e14c68_20130912+ #1 > [ 2.760381] Hardware name: Intel Corp. VALLEYVIEW B2 PLATFORM/NOTEBOOK, > BIOS > BBAYCRB1.X64.0055.R31.1308081542 BBAY_X64_R_V0055_31 08/08/2013 > [ 2.760394] 0000000000000000 ffff88003f9f16a8 ffffffff817d020f > 0000000000000 > 006 > [ 2.760409] ffffffff82859810 ffff88003f9f1778 ffffffff81089328 > 0000000000000006 > [ 2.760422] 0000000700046e00 ffffffff828a7470 0000000000000000 > ffffffff00000000 > [ 2.760436] Call Trace: > [ 2.760449] [<ffffffff817d020f>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58 > [ 2.760465] [<ffffffff81089328>] __lock_acquire+0x8b4/0x183b > [ 2.760477] [<ffffffff8108b004>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x142/0x19e > [ 2.760490] [<ffffffff8108b06d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf > [ 2.760501] [<ffffffff8104fb0d>] ? __flush_work+0x3a/0x1cc > [ 2.760513] [<ffffffff8107b4ea>] ? vprintk_emit+0x453/0x47f > [ 2.760524] [<ffffffff8108a7b3>] lock_acquire+0xcc/0x106 > [ 2.760534] [<ffffffff8104fd30>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x5a > [ 2.760545] [<ffffffff8108ae96>] ? mark_held_locks+0xce/0xfa > [ 2.760556] [<ffffffff8104fd61>] flush_work+0x36/0x5a > ............... > ............... That's again a different bug. Please file a new bug report for it.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>