<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Xorg memory leak with >=xf86-video-intel-2.99.901 and above" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70924#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Xorg memory leak with >=xf86-video-intel-2.99.901 and above" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70924">bug 70924</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:drJeckyll@Jeckyll.net" title="Ognian Tenchev <drJeckyll@Jeckyll.net>"> Ognian Tenchev</a> <pre>hm ... I switch to UXA with 2.99.905 in xorg.conf and now RES Xorg memory stays around 22-26MB just like 2.21.15. 2.99.x use SNA by default, 2.21.x with UXA by default may be ... but why there is so much difference between UXA and SNA in Xorg memory usage? And why my SNA just keep eat RAM ... Today all day working with SNA, RES Xorg memory was around 80MB but I never open large JPEG. Then open one large JPEG in Firefox and memory jump to 300MB and keep growing to 500MB ...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>