<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jinxianx.guo@intel.com" title="Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Guo Jinxian</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - [BYT Regression]eDP shows black screen while testing testdisplay -f 38.25,800,832,912,1024,600,603,607,624"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72752">bug 72752</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEEDINFO
           </td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - [BYT Regression]eDP shows black screen while testing testdisplay -f 38.25,800,832,912,1024,600,603,607,624"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72752#c3">Comment # 3</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - [BYT Regression]eDP shows black screen while testing testdisplay -f 38.25,800,832,912,1024,600,603,607,624"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72752">bug 72752</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jinxianx.guo@intel.com" title="Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Guo Jinxian</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=72752#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> Can you please bisect where this regression has been introduced?</span >

After bisect, We found first bad point on -next-queued branch
commit dff392dbd258381a6c3164f38420593f2d291e3b
Author: Paulo Zanoni <<a href="mailto:paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com">paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com</a>>
Date:   Fri Dec 6 17:32:41 2013 -0200

    drm/i915: don't touch the VDD when disabling the panel

    I don't see a reason to touch VDD when we're disabling the panel:
    since the panel is enabled, we don't need VDD. This saves a few sleep
    calls from the vdd_on and vdd_off functions at every modeset.

    Bugzilla: <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_VERIFIED  bz_closed"
   title="VERIFIED FIXED - [BYT]igt/kms_flip: DP link train fail due to IOSF sideband fabric timeout"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=69693">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69693</a>
    Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <<a href="mailto:rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com">rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com</a>>
    Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <<a href="mailto:paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com">paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com</a>>
    [danvet: Fix the patch mangle wiggle has done ... Spotted by Paulo.
    Also drop the runtime_pm_put call which now has to go due to different
    patch ordering. Also from Paul.]
    Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <<a href="mailto:daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch">daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch</a>>

Reverted this commit, the bug unable to reproduce.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>