<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - [snb] vsync hang" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68718#c13">Comment # 13</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - [snb] vsync hang" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68718">bug 68718</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> Ilia Mirkin</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=68718#c10">comment #10</a>) > Cool, that's important as for Ivybridge it is documented that the GPU must > be kept awake across the vsync, so it does not look like that is required > here. > > Which leaves the open question whether any Sandybridges sold did not have > the vsync feature (it was only added very late in the development cycle), or > if there is a w/a that I missed. I'm not really sure what you meant by your comment... Do the new traces show the same vsync error, or are they due to some other thing that maps triggers? (In the latter case should I file a fresh bug?) As for SNB revision, not sure if this is enough to identify which one I have, but here's some info: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0126] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:21d2] vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 42 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2540M CPU @ 2.60GHz stepping : 7 microcode : 0x28</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>