<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO --- - [hsw DP] Ubuntu 12.04 unable to use external monitor through edock"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73694#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO --- - [hsw DP] Ubuntu 12.04 unable to use external monitor through edock"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73694">bug 73694</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:candeb@free.fr" title="Itai BEN YAACOV <candeb@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Itai BEN YAACOV</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>
<span class="quote">> those. Unfortunately the "no regressions rule" trumps "correct by the
> specs", even when the latter fixes stuff.</span >
How about making it an option to the module ? Yes I know this is an ugly
solution, but will spare some of us the need to recompile the entire kernel.
And a "please follow the specs" option (when the default is not to follow) does
not seem entirely unreasonable, does it ?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>