<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Need one kernel option to enable all connected displays" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75552#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Need one kernel option to enable all connected displays" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75552">bug 75552</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch" title="Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>"> Daniel Vetter</a> <pre>On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:12 PM, <<a href="mailto:bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org">bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org</a>> wrote: > --- <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=75552#c7">Comment #7</a> from Jesse Barnes <<a href="mailto:jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org">jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org</a>> --- >> i.e. expect me to shot down a patch just adding the option ;-) > > All QA is asking for is a way to go back to the old behavior, which > should be pretty trivial. > > What is it you're threatening to shoot down so I don't bother posting > it? I think we should actually enable any outputs the bios didn't, while still keeping the bios' config wrt pipe selections and precise mode. At least I think that's the least suprising thing to do, and for almost all fastboot use-cases we don't care one bit about multihead.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>