<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - [gen2 865g] Bad stolen" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78416#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - [gen2 865g] Bad stolen" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78416">bug 78416</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" title="Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>"> Ville Syrjala</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=78416#c11">comment #11</a>) > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=78416#c10">comment #10</a>) > > The amount of memory stolen seems genuine. So what is suspect is its > > location then. > > My gen2 stolen base patches aren't in yet, so how can there be stolen > memory? Or do you suspect it's getting clobbered by something else? > > In any case the log is weird since it's missing the printk from the stolen > memory early quirk. The gen2 patches for those are definitely in 3.15-rc5, > so I would expect to see something, unless I fumbled the 865g part. That's > of course possible since I didn't have a machine to test with. Just to confirm some of that, I'd like to see what these say: setpci -s 0:2.0 0xc4.w intel_reg_read 0x2020</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>